verb
to involve in a charge; incriminate.
Inculpate, like inflammable, is capable of two opposite meanings depending on whether you take in- to be a negative prefix (from the same Proto-Indo-European source as English un-) or an intensive prefix. If in- is the negative prefix, then inculpate means “unblamed, blameless,” the only meaning of the Latin Գܱٳܲ and a meaning that inculpate had in (and only in) 17th-century English. Likewise inflammable would mean “not flammable,” a very common mistake in modern English. The in- in inculpate and inflammable is in fact the intensive in-; Late Latin Գܱ means “to blame”; Դڱ means “to set on fire.” The Romans, too, were confused by the two different prefixes: Բܻī (in- here the intensive prefix) means “to catch the sound of, get wind of, hear”; its past participle Բܻīٳܲ (in- here the negative prefix) means “unheard, unheard of, not listened to.” Inculpate in the sense “to blame” entered English in the late 18th century.
Then someone came into your room and placed the pistol there in order to inculpate you.
Their job was simply to get as much information as possible, which, along with corroborating evidence, would either inculpate the suspect or set him free.
Roborant comes from Latin ōǰԳ- (the stem of ōǰԲ), present participle of ōǰ “to strengthen, invigorate,” a derivative of the noun ōǰ (stem ōܰ-) “oak, oak tree.” From ōǰ Latin forms corōǰ “to strengthen, harden” (English corroborate). Latin also has an archaic form ōܲ for ōܰ, and the archaic form clearly shows the source of Latin ōܲtus “strong, powerful” (English robust). The Latin noun ōܲ is akin to the adjective ōܲ “red” and dialectal ūڳܲ “light red, fox red” (English rufous), the noun ōīō (also ūīō), stem ōī- (ūī-) “rust,” and its derivative adjective ōīōܲ “rusty” (English rubiginous). Roborant entered English in the 17th century.
… they put him to bed in the rest room, where the doctor gave him a roborant injection.
The label, designed for the English speaking market, gives this description of its virtues: “Nutritious and roborant: promoting the brain and recovering the memory: strengthening the organs and systems of generations.”
Dullsville, originally an Americanism, is an obvious, self-explanatory compound. The suffix -ville comes from the French noun and suffix ville, -ville “city, town,” a straightforward development of Latin villa “farmhouse, farm, estate.” Both French and English use the suffix -ville to form placenames (nearly 20 percent of the toponyms, or placenames, in northern France end in -ville); American toponyms include Gainesville, Charlottesville, and Chancellorsville. French and English also use -ville to form derogatory or disparaging quasi-toponyms: French has bidonville “shantytown,” formed from bidon “metal can, metal drum (used in constructing shanties).” American English has Hooverville, dating from the Great Depression of the 1930s, and named “in honor of” president Herbert Hoover; Squaresville, associated with the Beat Generation, dates from the mid-1950s; Hicksville dates from the early 1920s; dragsville dates from the mid-1960s; and dullsville (also Dullsville) from 1960.
Just that it was another system that didn’t look particularly noteworthy. A star and some planets. No record of human presence. Dullsville, really.
I work in a big insurance office now, working in the customer enquiries department. No doubt this will sound a bit dullsville to you …