Is “Emergency” The Right Word To Describe 黑料网’s Happening At The Border?

by Ashley Austrew and John Kelly

In late February 2019, the House of Representatives voted to block President Trump’s declaration of a national emergency at the Mexican border. Trump鈥檚 declaration鈥攊ssued on February, 15, 2019 and based on the emergency powers granted to the presidency by the Constitution鈥攚ould build a wall with funds not approved by Congress, which has authority over the nation’s finances and budget.

Trump聽justified his decision by stating there is an “invasion of drugs and criminals鈥� coming into the US via the Southern border, making a wall necessary for national security.

But, many are wondering, is emergency really the right word to describe what’s happening at the border?

黑料网 is an聽emergency?

础苍听emergency is “a sudden, urgent, usually unexpected occurrence or occasion requiring immediate action,” or “a state, especially of need for help or relief, created by some unexpected event.” First recorded in English in the 1600s,聽emergency ultimately comes from the Latin verb emergere, source of emerge and meaning 鈥渢o rise out or up鈥濃�攁s an emergency does.

Typically, we use聽别尘别谤驳别苍肠测听for situations that demand immediate action, such as seeking medical attention for a severe wound or providing relief to those displaced by a natural disaster. Emergencies, more generally, are unforeseen events for which there is very little time to prepare for.

Is there an emergency at the border?

Illegal border crossings have reached their highest numbers in over a decade. The US Border Patrol says it lacks the resources to address the situation, which smugglers can exploit to bring in contraband.

Despite this spike, illegal immigration overall remains at historic lows. Plus, most of the migrants are women and children seeking asylum from poverty and violence in their home countries鈥攏ot armed militants posing any significant risk to national security.

A March 2018 analysis of crime data from 1990鈥�2014 that was published in the journal Criminology last year concluded that “undocumented immigration does not increase violence.鈥澛�Moreover, the Drug Enforcement Agency (DEA) also notes that most drugs come into the US through legal ports of entry鈥攏ot at open borders between the US and Mexico.

Critics of Trump however, look no further than to his own language to make the case against his emergency. In fact, he contradicted his argument for an emergency during his very press conference about it: 鈥淚 could do the wall over a longer period of time. I didn鈥檛 need to do this. But I鈥檇 rather do it much faster.鈥�

President Trump provides every lawyer in the country with the core argument for why this *isn鈥檛* a national emergency: 鈥淚 didn鈥檛 need to do this, but I鈥檇 rather do it much faster.鈥�

— Tim O'Brien (@TimOBrien)

To the nearly 60 percent of Americans who don鈥檛 support his national emergency, Trump鈥檚 remarks aren’t, by definition, an emergency: 鈥渁 sudden, urgent, unexpected occurrence.鈥� Trump’s聽national emergency, for many of them, is better defined as 鈥渇ulfilling a campaign promise for his base.鈥�

黑料网 else might we call the situation at the border?

There are a lot of words Trump could have used that don’t involve declaring emergencies. Synonyms include exigency, plight, quandary, straits, and crisis.

Many would agree that the situation at the border is a 肠谤颈蝉颈蝉鈥�or, “a stage in a sequence of events at which the trend of all future events, especially for better or worse, is determined; a turning point鈥濃�攂ut not because there’s an invasion of drugs and criminals.

Immigration rights activists see a humanitarian crisis both because of conditions immigrants are facing in detainment at the border (two children died in US custody in December 2018) and due to the poverty and gang violence causing them to flee their homelands in their first place.

And, some legal scholars see a pending constitutional crisis, arguing that Trump has abused his power by issuing a fake emergency as a way around a Congress鈥攁nd the people who elected it鈥攖hat denied the full money he desired for a wall.

This is a constitutional crisis. Article I expressly forbids spending money except as appropriated by Congress. Congress had repeatedly refused to provide funds to build the wall. 2/13

— Elizabeth Goitein (@LizaGoitein)

It’s clear that opinions certainly don鈥檛 align on what to call the challenges we鈥檙e facing at the border, but many of us will agree that our divisions, as a country, can make it feel like we鈥檙e all having quite the聽existential crisis.